Difference between revisions of "Books"

From Mike Clark's Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Economics)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
I haven't read many books on economics, but I've found it a fascinating subject.
 
I haven't read many books on economics, but I've found it a fascinating subject.
  
 +
*[https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-Thomas-Sowell-ebook/dp/B06XCH5NGZ Basic Economics] by Thomas Sowell. As of February 2020 I am currently reading this surprisingly fascinating economics textbook. I assume it's a textbook, anyway. The first chapter, on Price Theory, is very eye-opening. I kind of already had a grasp on this, but Sowell makes it even more understandable. The book was published in 2015, and it is already on its fifth edition, so this 600+ page book on "the dismal science" seems to have hit a nerve somewhere.
 
*[https://www.amazon.com/Law-Frederic-Bastiat/dp/1940177014 The Law by Frederic Bastiat] - "The Law was originally published as a pamphlet in 1850 by Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850). Bastiat wrote most of his work in the few years before and after the French Revolution of 1848. The Law is considered a classic and his ideas are still relevant today."
 
*[https://www.amazon.com/Law-Frederic-Bastiat/dp/1940177014 The Law by Frederic Bastiat] - "The Law was originally published as a pamphlet in 1850 by Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850). Bastiat wrote most of his work in the few years before and after the French Revolution of 1848. The Law is considered a classic and his ideas are still relevant today."
 
*[https://www.amazon.com/Economics-One-Lesson-Shortest-Understand/dp/0517548232 ''Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest and Surest Way to Understand Basic Economics'' by Henry Hazlitt] - this book is written from the perspective of the Austrian School of economics, which is a libertarian perspective. Hazlitt (1894-1993) was the founder of the Foundation for Economic Education, an organization I have in times past been a follower of.
 
*[https://www.amazon.com/Economics-One-Lesson-Shortest-Understand/dp/0517548232 ''Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest and Surest Way to Understand Basic Economics'' by Henry Hazlitt] - this book is written from the perspective of the Austrian School of economics, which is a libertarian perspective. Hazlitt (1894-1993) was the founder of the Foundation for Economic Education, an organization I have in times past been a follower of.
*[https://www.amazon.com/Economy-Cities-Jane-Jacobs/dp/039470584X ''The Economy of Cities'', by Jane Jacobs] - From the books blurb at Amazon: "In this book, Jane Jacobs, building on the work of her debut, ''The Death and Life of Great American Cities'', investigates the delicate way cities balance the interplay between the domestic production of goods and the ever-changing tide of imports. Using case studies of developing cities in the ancient, pre-agricultural world, and contemporary cities on the decline, like the financially irresponsible New York City of the mid-sixties, Jacobs identifies the main drivers of urban prosperity and growth, often via counterintuitive and revelatory lessons." I don't know what impelled me to read this, and as I read it many many years ago, before I was at all knowledgeable about the subject, I found it very interesting.
+
*[https://www.amazon.com/Economy-Cities-Jane-Jacobs/dp/039470584X ''The Economy of Cities'', by Jane Jacobs] - I don't what attracted me to this book, but as I read it many many years ago I found it very interesting. What was it about? From the books blurb at Amazon: "In this book, Jane Jacobs, building on the work of her debut, ''The Death and Life of Great American Cities'', investigates the delicate way cities balance the interplay between the domestic production of goods and the ever-changing tide of imports. Using case studies of developing cities in the ancient, pre-agricultural world, and contemporary cities on the decline, like the financially irresponsible New York City of the mid-sixties, Jacobs identifies the main drivers of urban prosperity and growth, often via counterintuitive and revelatory lessons."
  
 
There've been others, of course.
 
There've been others, of course.

Revision as of 03:41, 11 February 2020

I've always been a reader. The first word I remember being able to read was the word "AND", which my 1st or 2nd grade teacher wrote on the chalkboard. After my mother died I lived with my great grandmother for a time, until my dad remarried, and she liked to read to me from the Bible. While living with her I was given many children's books, including a number of the Little Golden Books.

TawnyScrawnyLion.jpg

My favorite children's book was "Tawny Scrawny Lion"! It starts out:

"Once there was a tawny scrawny lion who chased monkeys on Monday—kangaroos on Tuesday—zebras on Wednesday—bears on Thursday—camels on Friday—and on Saturday, elephants!"

Very elementary, yes, and now that I think about it, it occurs to me that this lion couldn't have chased kangaroos on one day and then zebras the next, since these two types of animals lived about 8,000 miles apart! Never mind. By the time I was in 3rd grade I was reading material normally given to junior high pupils. I was mainly interested in scientific subjects, such as astronomy and dinosaurs. I really didn't care for the "Dick sees Sally run. Sally sees her dog run." that was on offer at that age. I was so disinterested in that drivel that my teacher thought I couldn't read well enough to be advanced to 4th grade, so was going to fail me. But my stepmom came with me to school for a conference about this, and brought one of my favorite science books, about astronomy. She had me read out of the book to the teacher, which apparently surprised her, and so I went into the 4th grade.

How many different books have I read? No way to tell. The following shows the categories of books I have read and am still reading.

Fiction

General Fiction

Science Fiction

Military Science Fiction

Non-Fiction

Biography

History

Economics

I haven't read many books on economics, but I've found it a fascinating subject.

  • Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell. As of February 2020 I am currently reading this surprisingly fascinating economics textbook. I assume it's a textbook, anyway. The first chapter, on Price Theory, is very eye-opening. I kind of already had a grasp on this, but Sowell makes it even more understandable. The book was published in 2015, and it is already on its fifth edition, so this 600+ page book on "the dismal science" seems to have hit a nerve somewhere.
  • The Law by Frederic Bastiat - "The Law was originally published as a pamphlet in 1850 by Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850). Bastiat wrote most of his work in the few years before and after the French Revolution of 1848. The Law is considered a classic and his ideas are still relevant today."
  • Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest and Surest Way to Understand Basic Economics by Henry Hazlitt - this book is written from the perspective of the Austrian School of economics, which is a libertarian perspective. Hazlitt (1894-1993) was the founder of the Foundation for Economic Education, an organization I have in times past been a follower of.
  • The Economy of Cities, by Jane Jacobs - I don't what attracted me to this book, but as I read it many many years ago I found it very interesting. What was it about? From the books blurb at Amazon: "In this book, Jane Jacobs, building on the work of her debut, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, investigates the delicate way cities balance the interplay between the domestic production of goods and the ever-changing tide of imports. Using case studies of developing cities in the ancient, pre-agricultural world, and contemporary cities on the decline, like the financially irresponsible New York City of the mid-sixties, Jacobs identifies the main drivers of urban prosperity and growth, often via counterintuitive and revelatory lessons."

There've been others, of course.

Science and Technology

I'm mostly into hard sciences.

Theology

As a Christian, my interest in theology should be obvious, but I am also interested in non-Christian religions. It is a good idea to understand how other people believe (or don't believe, in the case of atheists).